WebApr 20, 2024 · As we argue in our petition, the FISC and FISCR were wrong about the First Amendment. Our legal system is founded on the presumption that laws are public. That presumption applies to all judicial opinions containing significant interpretations of law. There’s no special exception for opinions involving government surveillance and national ... Webqualified right of access to FISC opinions public containing significant legal analysis —even if portions of the published opinions must be redacted. The FISC rejected one of these motions on the merits. Subsequently, in this case, the FISC and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review (“FISCR”)
In the Supreme Court of the United States
WebSep 25, 2024 · FISCR acknowledged that civil liberties groups that brought suit had satisfied two of the three jurisdictional requirements. First, a lack of access to these opinions was unquestionably an injury that could be redressed by a court, making the case actionable and live. Second, the FISC withheld those opinions based on federal law. WebJun 30, 2024 · Access to this Court's opinions and orders containing novel or significant legal interpretations is equally essential to development of the law as it is to democratic oversight. Mov. Br. at 16-20. "Without access to judicial opinions, public oversight of the courts, including the processes and the outcomes they produce, would be impossible." inadvertent energization protection
ACLU v. United States American Civil Liberties Union
WebAbout the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court was established in 1978 when Congress enacted the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which is codified, as … WebMar 26, 2024 · Historically, FISC opinions and appellate decisions by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review ("FISCR") were ex parte and classified. Id. ¶ 8. However, the USA FREEDOM Act, which was passed in the wake of the September 11th, 2001 terrorist attacks, required a declassification review of "significant" FISC and FISCR … inadvertent fiduciary